BUS
430 Entire Course ( International Business Law ) Complete Course
Follow Link Below To
Get Tutorial
Description:
BUS 430 Week 1 DQ 1
What are some differences when doing
business internationally opposed to domestically? How do international business
risks differ from domestic business risk? What factors influence these risks?
BUS 430 Week 1 DQ2
Why do corporations need to be
concerned with human rights issues when conducting business internationally?
Who are corporations accountable to – the government of their home country, the
host country, investors, or the public? What is the rationale for your answer?
BUS 430 Week 1 Individual Assignment
Comparative Law Worksheet
BUS 430 Week 2 Course Description
BUS 430 Week 2 DQ1
What is the Conventions on Contracts
for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)? What is the Uniform Commercial Code
(UCC)? In what ways is the coverage of the CISG and the UCC similar or
different? Explain your answer.
BUS 430 Week 2 DQ2
You work for an international furniture
company. Your company has customers in England, Mexico, Guatemala, and China.
How would you evaluate the credit worthiness of firms in these countries? How
does the credit risk differ between these countries? Would you sell to a
company in these countries without a letter of credit? Explain why or why not.
BUS 430 Week 2 Individual Assignment
International Law Memo
BUS 430 Week 3 Course Description
BUS 430 Week 3 DQ1
What are the basic principles of the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)? What are the basic principles
behind the World Trade Organization (WTO)? In what ways are GATT and the WTO
similar or different? How do the WTO and GATT settle disputes? Provide
examples.
BUS 430 Week 3 DQ2
Ressorp, Inc. in Japan agreed to
sell 700 television sets to Reardon, a wholesaler, in the United States for US$
144,417.00. Ressorp, Inc. and Reardon expressly agreed that Reardon would not
pay for the television sets until Reardon both received and sold the
merchandise in the United States. They also agreed that the merchandise would
be shipped CPT Portstown in the United States and that Incoterms 2010 would
govern. Ressorp, Inc. arranged to ship the goods with Oceanic Carriers, whose
place of business is located in Beachtown, Japan. Ressorp, Inc. loaded the
goods from its warehouse into a trailer and delivered the trailer to Oceanic’s
freight depot in Beachtown. Several days later, the trailer was discovered to
be missing and then it was found abandoned and empty. Reardon, the buyer, then
sued Oceanic Carriers. The carrier challenged Reardon’s standing (right) to sue
claiming that the original contract said Reardon had no liability to pay for
the merchandise until after it was received and sold by Reardon. Therefore,
Oceanic Carriers argued, it was the seller, Ressorp, Inc. who should have
brought the suit, not Reardon. Is Oceanic correct? Explain why or why
not.
BUS 430 Week 3 DQ3
The Jolly Canning Co. in Hawaii
agreed to sell 10,000 cases of canned green beans to the Merry Produce Co. in
New York. The terms were FOB Bigport in Hawaii. The parties agreed that the
governing rules were Incoterms 2010. Jolly, by mistake, delivered 10,000 cases
of canned corn to the carrier in Bigport. Moreover, the bill of lading clearly
stated that goods were canned corn. While the goods were in transit, they were
damaged by seawater because of the carrier’s negligence. Jolly sues the
carrier, but the carrier challenges Jolly’s standing (right) to sue. The
carrier claims that the risk of loss had passed to Merry Produce (the consignee
on the bill of lading) as soon as the goods had passed the ship’s rail. Is the
carrier correct? Should Jolly’s suit be dismissed? Explain why or why not.
BUS 430 Week 3 Learning Team
Assignment Case Study Presentation
BUS 430 Week 4 Course Description
BUS 430 Week 4 DQ1
Describe the benefits and detriments
of the EU and U. S. rules regarding jurisdiction and forum in privately
enforced competition laws. What are the advantages and disadvantages, from the
perspective of competition law, in having a wholly foreign subsidiary in
Europe?
BUS 430 Week 4 DQ2
Are the actions undertaken by the
companies or individuals in the following scenarios legal or illegal pursuant
to U. S. law? Please explain each of your answers.
1. A wire transfer of $200,000 to the Minister of Contracting of Gambia made by Bordeaux Builders, Inc., a French corporation, and originating from its corporate headquarters in New York in order to secure a construction contract,
1. A wire transfer of $200,000 to the Minister of Contracting of Gambia made by Bordeaux Builders, Inc., a French corporation, and originating from its corporate headquarters in New York in order to secure a construction contract,
2. A birthday
card and bottle of Californian wine sent annually by Woody Pulp, the chief
executive officer of Pacific Paper Products, Inc., a U. S. corporation, to his
long-standing friend who is the Director of Government Procurement for the
Japanese government.
3. A cash
payment of $100 made by an agent of Chicago Chemicals Co., a U. S. corporation,
to a processing clerk in the Chilean Office of Business Licensing in order to
expedite consideration of CCC’s application for authority to conduct business
operations in Chile,
4. A cash
payment of $250,000 made by Durdy Coal, Inc., a U. S. corporation, to DCI’s
agent with the instruction, “put this to good use on DCI’s behalf,” which in
turn is paid to the State Importation Officer of the People’s Republic of China
in order to secure a Chinese import license
BUS 430 Week 4 Individual Assignment
GATT and WTO Paper
BUS 430 Week 5 Course Description
BUS 430 Week 5 Individual Assignment
Natural Gas Case Study
BUS 430 Week 5 Learning Team
Assignment Riordan Manufacturing Analysis
No comments:
Post a Comment